Effects of Fentanyl or Clonidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Urinary Retention after Caudal Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Caudal administration of local anesthetics, opioids, and the alpha2 adrenergic agonists is effective for postoperative pain. Intrathecal and epidural opioids may commonly result in urinary retention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of fentanyl or clonidine on postoperative analgesia and urinary retention. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing a hemorrhoidectomy were randomly assigned to receive 20ml of 2% lidocaine and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine plus clonidine 100 microgram (group C100, n = 10), clonidine 150 microgram (group C150, n = 10), fentanyl 50 microgram (group F50, n = 10), or fentanyl 100 microgram (group F100, n = 10) for caudal anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured before anesthesia and immediately postanesthesia, and every 5 min after caudal administration for 30 min. The following variables were recorded: onset time, analgesic time, voiding time, and urinary retention. RESULTS: The MAP at 20, 25, and 30 min in group C150 (91 +/- 7, 91 +/- 6, and 90 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively) was less than in group F50 (99 +/- 4, 101 +/- 6, and 101 +/- 5 mmHg, respectively) (P < 0.05). There was no difference in HR and onset time of anesthesia among the groups. Analgesic times in groups C150, F50, and F100 (270 +/- 22, 265 +/- 23, and 323 +/- 82 min, respectively) were longer than in group C100 (207 +/- 59 min), (P < 0.05). The number of patients using a urinary catheter to void was much higher in group F100 (7 patients) than in the groups C100, C150, or F50 (4, 5, and 3 patients, respectively) (P < 0.05). The voiding time was longer in group C150 than in group C100 (369 +/- 122 min vs 266 +/- 83 min, P < 0.05). No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that clonidine 150 microgram is adequate to provide effective analgesia and a low incidence of urinary retention during caudal anesthesia.

The Effect of Butorphanol on Propofol-N2O-O2 Anesthesia: Propofol Dose Requirements, Hemodynamic Responses, and Postoperative Recovery Profiles / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: This study was proposed to examine the effects of butorphanol on propofol dose requirements and hemodynamic responses during propofol-N2O-O2 anesthesia. In addition, the effects of butorphanol on the recovery time, sedation score and postoperative first analgesic request time were assessed. METHODS: Forty patients were allocated to 2 groups. Twenty patients received butorphanol (20 microgram/kg, group (B) and the others received an equal volume of placebo (group P) 3 minutes before induction with propofol. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with propofol (6 - 10 mg/kg, iv)-N2O (70%)-O2 (30%). Propofol doses for induction and maintenance and hemodynamic responses (blood pressure, heart rate) were checked. After surgery, sedation score, recovery profiles, and postoperative first analgesic request time were assessed. RESULTS: The induction doses of propofol were lower in group B than in group P. Diastolic pressure and heart rate decreased in group B compared to group P after endotracheal intubation and before skin incision. After skin incision, decreased diastolic pressure and heart rate returned to preanesthetic levels in group P, but the decreased level was sustained in group B. There were group differences in sedation score at 5 and 10 minutes after extubation. In group B, recovery was delayed and more time elapsed before the first analgesic request. CONCLUSIONS: Butorphanol co-administered with propofol reduces the induction dose of propofol and delays the first analgesic request time, but there are significant fluctuations in blood pressure and heart rate during endotracheal intubation and skin incision.

Hypercarbia Due to Mistaken Supply of Carbon Dioxide Originating from Nitrous Oxide Gas Tank: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

A 49 year-old male was scheduled for a cholecystectomy, thereafter a 37 year-old female scheduled for removal of a epidural hematoma in the same operating room. Both of them had no specific medical problems and past medical histories for anesthesia. For those reasons, anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and succinylcholine with endotracheal intubation. After induction, vital signs including body temperatures were stable. But moisture dew in the unidirectional valves and corrugated tubes, and color changes of soda lime were discovered. At that time, severe hypercarbia was recognized by arterial blood gas analysis in both cases. In both cases, there were no malfunctions in unidirectional valves, expiratory valves, corrugation tubes, soda lime, ventilators and there connection parts in the anesthetic machines. Also there were no abnormalities of blood pressures, electrocardiograms, pulse oxymeters, temperatures and the pulse in the patient monitoring systems except capnography. At first, we thought that medical signs revealed malignant hyperthermias. But vital signs, air way pressures and functions of all kinds of anesthetic machine components including ventilators were normal. After discontinuing N2O gas deliveries in the operation room, hypercarbias disappeared. Thus, anesthetic gas delivery systems via central piping systems were checked and it was discovered that CO2 gas was in the N2O gas tank instead of N2O.